El Foro de El Anzuelo Club de Pesca
[
Inicio
] [
Nuevo Tema
]
Autor
Titulo
Mensaje
[citar]What sort of work do you do? <a href=" http://www.frogtemple.com/zyprexa-pediatric-dosage.pdf#gus ">zyprexa alcohol use</a> "Any speculation or reports you may read in the media or elsewhere or here in the press are conjecture. They are not based on fact because the people who know the facts are not talking about them. The parties have agreed that I will be the only one making further comments about this," Kerry said. <a href=" http://www.pontoaurora.com/prozac-bestellen-rezeptfrei.pdf ">prix prozac 20 mg</a> The main thing I take from this is that the authors don’t seem to understand what comparative advantage is. (Hint: It’s NOT the same thing as competitive advantage.) Comparative advantage refers to the ability to produce at lower opportunity cost. There are two ways to have a comparative advantage- be good at producing something or be bad at producing other things. The Korean comparative advantage that the authors refer to is likely a little from column A and a little from column B. The authors also seem to be using “economy” and “producers” interchangeably, as in “And Econ 101 never explains how foreign mercantilist practices, like those China is embracing, can hurt the U.S. economy.” In reality, the economy consists of both producers and consumers, and consumers benefit from the cheap stuff generated as a result of these policies. (Believe me, there are plenty of reasons to be wary of China, but “they’re sending us cheap junk” is not at the top of that list.) I’m not even sure what to make of the last paragraph except to point out that the gains from trade don’t really rely on WHY a particular nation has a cost advantage. [/citar]